Latin American Music Review

402 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 402 papers published in Latin American Music Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Latin American Music Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (156 papers), Music (146 papers) and Cultural Studies (112 papers) specifically the topics of Music History and Culture (106 papers), Cuban History and Society (69 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Latin American Music Review are Thomas Turino, Gerard Béhague, Peter Manuel, Bruno Nettl, Steven Feld, John Storm Roberts, Gilbert Chase, Jorge Duany, Lise Waxer and Robin Moore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Latin American Music Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Latin American Music Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Latin American Music Review.

Countries where authors publish in Latin American Music Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Latin American Music Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Latin American Music Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Latin American Music Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025