International Philosophical Quarterly

17.7k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
    • Philosophy and History of Science

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 104
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 94
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 90
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 70
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 68
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 54
    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 47

International Philosophical Quarterly

637 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

International Philosophical Quarterly
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
  • Philosophy 7.5k
  • History and Philosophy of Science 2.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.5k
  • General Psychology 254
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
Replace International Studies in Philosophy with:
International Studies in Philosophy United States
The Monist United States
Canadian Journal of Philosophy United States
Inquiry United States
Teaching Philosophy United States
Philosophy United Kingdom
Journal of the history of philosophy United States
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) United Kingdom
European Journal of Philosophy United States
The Southern Journal of Philosophy United States
International Philosophical Quarterly relative to International Studies in Philosophy United States International Studies in Philosophy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.5×
International Studies in Philosophy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Philosophical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Philosophical Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Philosophical Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Philosophical Quarterly more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Philosophical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Philosophical Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Philosophical Quarterly.

About International Philosophical Quarterly

The 1.6k papers published in International Philosophical Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations . Papers published in International Philosophical Quarterly usually cover Philosophy (613 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (96 papers), Religious studies (67 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 papers) and Theoretical Computer Science (8 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (104 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (94 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (90 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (78 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (70 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (68 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (54 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Philosophical Quarterly are David R. Hiley, Paul Moser, Tom L. Beauchamp, Merold Westphal, Howard H. Harriott, Peter H. Hare, John Donnelly, Robert E. Innis, David Ingram and Daniel A. Dombrowski.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact