Daniel A. Dombrowski
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
Papers in
- Philosophy 32
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 9
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 8
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 7
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 5
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 4
- Co-authors
- David Weinberger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (3 papers)Teaching Philosophy (2 papers)Sophia (2 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (2 papers)Apeiron (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel A. Dombrowski
52 papers receiving 470 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Philosophy 284
- Political Science and International Relations 214
- Cognitive Neuroscience 101
- General Psychology 7
- History and Philosophy of Science 26
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Dombrowski
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Dombrowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Dombrowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Dombrowski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Dombrowski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Dombrowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Dombrowski. The network helps show where Daniel A. Dombrowski may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Dombrowski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 304 | |
| 2 | Babies and Beasts: THE ARGUMENT FROM MARGINAL CASES | 1997 | 83 |
| 3 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 10 | Divine Beauty: The Aesthetics of Charles Hartshorne | 2004 | 6 |
| 11 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 15 | Hartshorne and the metaphysics of animal rights | 1988 | 4 |
| 16 | Kazantzakis and God | 1997 | 4 |
| 17 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1979 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 4 |
About Daniel A. Dombrowski
Daniel A. Dombrowski is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Archeology and Social Psychology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (9 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (7 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Whitehead's Philosophy and Applications (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (284 citations), Political Science and International Relations (214 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (101 citations), General Psychology (7 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (26 citations). Daniel A. Dombrowski has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Weinberger. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Teaching Philosophy, Sophia, Journal of the History of Ideas and Apeiron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.