Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences

10.2k citations
912 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics 110
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 93
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 75
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 70
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 64
    • Gene expression and cancer classification 64

Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences

841 papers receiving 9.6k citations

Peers

Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.5k
  • Health Informatics 107
  • Molecular Biology 4.5k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 944
  • Cancer Research 585
Replace IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience with:
IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience China
CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology United States
Biophysical Reviews United States
SLAS TECHNOLOGY United States
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics United States
Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics India
The EPMA Journal Germany
Current Bioinformatics China
Biomedical Journal Taiwan
BioScience Trends China
Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences relative to IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience China IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences.

About Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences

The 912 papers published in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences usually cover Drug Discovery (2 papers), Molecular Biology (580 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (146 papers), Cancer Research (72 papers) and Microbiology (24 papers) specifically the topics of Computational Drug Discovery Methods (141 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (110 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (93 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (75 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (70 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (64 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (64 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences are Le Zhang, Ailing Fu, Jin Li, Dong‐Qing Wei, Pritish Kumar Varadwaj, Shaoliang Peng, Jamal Aïssa, Luc Montagnier, Qi Zhao and Utkarsh Raj.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact