Ailing Fu

3.5k citations
61 papers · 2.9k · 2 hit papers · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Ailing Fu

61 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Ailing Fu's Hit Papers

Progress in molecular docking 2019 · 450 citations
4500+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Ailing Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Neurology 214
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 442
  • Biomaterials 264
  • Drug Discovery 4
  • Molecular Biology 785
Replace Hongwei Jin with:
Hongwei Jin China
Sergey Shityakov Russia
Werner J. Geldenhuys United States
Golgodu Krishnamurthy Rajanikant India
Vadim V. Tarasov Russia
Yumei Wang China
Carmen Gil Spain
Nasimudeen R. Jabir Saudi Arabia
Magdalena Markowicz-Piasecka Poland
Keld Fosgerau Denmark
Ailing Fu relative to Hongwei Jin China Hongwei Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Hongwei Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ailing Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ailing Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ailing Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ailing Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ailing Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ailing Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ailing Fu. The network helps show where Ailing Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ailing Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ailing Fu Line = papers co-authored together Ailing Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Progress in molecular docking
Hit paper breakdown →
2019450
2
An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein–Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking
Hit paper breakdown →
2019330
3 2017181
4 2006130
5 2017124
6 2019119
7 201981
8 201975
9 202170
10 201864
11 201263
12 201761
13 202060
14 202059
15 201856
16 201853
17 201051
18 201047
19 200843
20 201743

About Ailing Fu

Ailing Fu is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (9 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (9 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (6 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (6 papers), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (3 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (3 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (214 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (442 citations), Biomaterials (264 citations), Drug Discovery (4 citations) and Molecular Biology (785 citations). Ailing Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Le Zhang, Jiyu Fan, Chen Fu, Jin Li, Zizhen Zhao, Rajendiran Keerthiga, De‐Sheng Pei, Manji Sun, Zhaohui Dong and Xiaorong Li. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Materials Science and Engineering C, Pharmaceutical Research, International Journal of Biological Sciences and Mitochondrion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact