Current Bioinformatics

9.9k citations
1.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
    • Gene expression and cancer classification
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics
    • Computational Drug Discovery Methods

Papers in

    • Computational Drug Discovery Methods 181
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics 306
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 192
    • Gene expression and cancer classification 132
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 106
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 105
    • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research 95
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 78

Current Bioinformatics

976 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Peers

Current Bioinformatics
Comparison fields: 5 of 208
  • Molecular Biology 6.7k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.5k
  • Cancer Research 937
  • Health Information Management 175
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.2k
Replace Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences with:
Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences China
Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology United States
IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience China
Cancer Informatics United States
SoftwareX United States
GigaScience United States
SLAS TECHNOLOGY United States
npj Precision Oncology United States
Molecular Informatics United States
Cell Reports Medicine United States
Current Bioinformatics relative to Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences China Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Current Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Bioinformatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Bioinformatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Bioinformatics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Bioinformatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Bioinformatics.

About Current Bioinformatics

The 1.1k papers published in Current Bioinformatics in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Bioinformatics usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (188 papers), Molecular Biology (794 papers), Cancer Research (113 papers), Health Information Management (15 papers) and Biophysics (14 papers) specifically the topics of Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (306 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (192 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (181 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (132 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (106 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (105 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (95 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Bioinformatics are Quan Zou, Lei Chen, Bing Bing Zhou, Albert Y. Zomaya, Pengyi Yang, Jean Yang, Shao Li, Yi Zou, Jun Zhang and Bin Liu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact