SLAS TECHNOLOGY

16.9k citations
909 papers · · active since 2012

Impact in

    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
    • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

Papers in

    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications 140
    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 67
    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection 58
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation 49
    • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies 48
    • Cell Image Analysis Techniques 45

SLAS TECHNOLOGY

841 papers receiving 16.4k citations

Peers

SLAS TECHNOLOGY
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Biomedical Engineering 5.6k
  • Health Informatics 214
  • Neurology 493
  • Pharmaceutical Science 425
  • Biophysics 394
Replace International Journal of Oral Science with:
International Journal of Oral Science China
Biophysical Reviews United States
Military Medical Research China
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences United States
Trends in cancer United States
Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis China
IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience China
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging China
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering United States
Advances in Wound Care United States
SLAS TECHNOLOGY relative to International Journal of Oral Science China International Journal of Oral Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
International Journal of Oral Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in SLAS TECHNOLOGY

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in SLAS TECHNOLOGY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in SLAS TECHNOLOGY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SLAS TECHNOLOGY more than expected).

Fields of papers published in SLAS TECHNOLOGY

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in SLAS TECHNOLOGY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in SLAS TECHNOLOGY.

About SLAS TECHNOLOGY

The 909 papers published in SLAS TECHNOLOGY in the last decades have received a total of 16.9k indexed citations . Papers published in SLAS TECHNOLOGY usually cover Biomedical Engineering (311 papers), Biophysics (50 papers), Chemical Health and Safety (3 papers), Information Systems and Management (35 papers) and Drug Discovery (1 paper) specifically the topics of Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (140 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (67 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (58 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (49 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (48 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (47 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (45 papers) and Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in SLAS TECHNOLOGY are Balaji Srinivasan, Mandy Brigitte Esch, Hasan Erbil Abaci, James J. Hickman, Aditya Reddy Kolli, Michael Louis Shuler, Amar S. Basu, Dino Di Carlo, Steve C. H. Tung and Kin Fong Lei.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact