Information Economics and Policy

849 papers and 19.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 849 papers published in Information Economics and Policy in the last decades have received a total of 19.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Information Economics and Policy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (415 papers), Strategy and Management (398 papers) and Media Technology (370 papers) specifically the topics of ICT Impact and Policies (370 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (352 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (217 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Economics and Policy are Jock Given, Matti Pohjola, Gerald R. Faulhaber, Harald Gruber, Martin Peitz, Cristiano Antonelli, Joel Waldfogel, Thomas Barnebeck Andersen, Avi Goldfarb and Dennis L. Weisman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information Economics and Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Economics and Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Economics and Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Information Economics and Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Economics and Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Economics and Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Economics and Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025