Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

889 papers and 19.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 889 papers published in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 19.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology usually cover Molecular Biology (392 papers), Oncology (241 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (188 papers) specifically the topics of Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (165 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (105 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology are Paul Komminoth, Ricardo V. Lloyd, Marc Ladanyi, Beiyun Chen, Marc Ladanyi, Gerard J. Nuovo, Xiang Qian, Qiulu Pan, Hubert J. Wolfe and Salvador J. Díaz‐Cano.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diagnostic Molecular Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025