International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

3.1k citations
453 papers · · active since 2001

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

409 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

International Journal of Technology Policy and Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Strategy and Management 685
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 314
  • Business and International Management 29
  • Management Information Systems 275
  • Marketing 220
Replace Business Economics with:
Business Economics United States
Journal of Industry Competition and Trade United States
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics Italy
E+M Ekonomie a Management Czechia
Journal of Institutional Economics United States
IIMB Management Review India
Transnational Corporation Review India
Verslas teorija ir praktika Lithuania
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE Germany
Revista de Gestão Brazil
International Journal of Technology Policy and Management relative to Business Economics United States Business Economics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Business Economics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Technology Policy and Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management.

About International Journal of Technology Policy and Management

The 453 papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management usually cover Business and International Management (8 papers), Strategy and Management (107 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (50 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (69 papers) and Media Technology (37 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (51 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (33 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (30 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (23 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (19 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (16 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (16 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Technology Policy and Management are Vincent Marchau, Mario Coccia, Inderpreet Singh Ahuja, Jan H. Kwakkel, Warren E. Walker, John P.M. Groenewegen, Joop F. M. Koppenjan, Pieter W. G. Bots, Igor Stefan Mayer and Chung-Kuang Hou.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact