Revista de Gestão

498 papers and 2.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 498 papers published in Revista de Gestão in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Revista de Gestão usually cover Information Systems and Management (212 papers), Strategy and Management (145 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (89 papers) specifically the topics of Business and Management Studies (192 papers), Education and Public Policy (44 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revista de Gestão are Eluiza Alberto de Morais Watanabe, Solange Alfinito, Anselmo Ferreira Vasconcelos, Flávio Hourneaux, Simone Sehnem, Lily Julienti Abu Bakar, Clandia Maffini Gomes, Jordana Marques Kneipp, Roberto Schoproni Bichueti and Guilherme Lerch Lunardi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revista de Gestão

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revista de Gestão. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revista de Gestão.

Countries where authors publish in Revista de Gestão

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revista de Gestão. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revista de Gestão with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revista de Gestão more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025