Business Economics

562 papers and 7.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 562 papers published in Business Economics in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Business Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (224 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (136 papers) and Finance (96 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (77 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (63 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Business Economics are Jan Kmenta, Apurv Jain, Lawrence H. Summers, Annamaria Lusardi, W. Steven Barnett, Michael E. Porter, Charles Steindel, Claudio Borio, Thomas A. Hemphill and John C. Williams.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Business Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Business Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Business Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Business Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Business Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Business Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Business Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025