International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)

6.3k citations
693 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)

604 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Computer Science Applications 1.2k
  • Media Technology 868
  • Education 2.7k
  • Architecture 123
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 880
Replace Education for Chemical Engineers with:
Education for Chemical Engineers Spain
IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje Spain
Performance Improvement Quarterly United States
Technical Communication Quarterly United States
Journal of Business and Technical Communication United States
Journal of Information Technology Education Research United States
Computers in the Schools United States
Active Learning in Higher Education United Kingdom
Learning Environments Research United States
Journal of Baltic Science Education Türkiye
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) relative to Education for Chemical Engineers Spain Education for Chemical Engineers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Education for Chemical Engineers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP).

About International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)

The 693 papers published in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) usually cover Computer Science Applications (139 papers), Architecture (34 papers), Media Technology (179 papers), Education (270 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (82 papers) specifically the topics of Experimental Learning in Engineering (107 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (93 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (61 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (61 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (46 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (43 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (42 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) are Athanasios Drigas, Marios A. Pappas, Maria Karyotaki, Chrysovalantis Kefalis, Teresa Larkin, Mohammed El-Abd, Sébastien Jacques, Ebenezer Annan, Andy M. Connor and Bill Lucas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact