AEM Education and Training

746 papers and 4.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 746 papers published in AEM Education and Training in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in AEM Education and Training usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (398 papers), Emergency Medicine (200 papers) and General Health Professions (165 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (351 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (158 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AEM Education and Training are Teresa M. Chan, Michael Gottlieb, Wendy C. Coates, Lalena M. Yarris, Jaime Jordan, Jonathan Sherbino, Sean Dyer, Christopher Eric McCoy, Robert Lam and Chad Stickrath.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in AEM Education and Training

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AEM Education and Training. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AEM Education and Training.

Countries where authors publish in AEM Education and Training

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AEM Education and Training. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AEM Education and Training with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AEM Education and Training more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025