Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology

651 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 651 papers published in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (321 papers), Molecular Biology (237 papers) and Genetics (182 papers) specifically the topics of Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (168 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (113 papers) and Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology are David Hoffman, Ken K. Y. Ho, Mari Satoh, Eiji Kawasaki, Toshiaki Tanaka, Katsuhiko Tachibana, Seizo Suwa, Mitsunori Murata, Toshihiro Tajima and Noriko Kato.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025