International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching

1.9k citations
304 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching

271 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Language and Linguistics 664
  • Literature and Literary Theory 503
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 556
  • Computer Science Applications 212
  • Health Informatics 41
Replace The JALT CALL Journal with:
The JALT CALL Journal Japan
Teaching English With Technology Iran
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education Iran
Journal of Writing Research United States
Review of Education United Kingdom
Language Testing in Asia Iran
Pedagogies An International Journal United States
Digital Education Review Spain
Journal of language and Education Russia
Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal Japan
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching relative to The JALT CALL Journal Japan The JALT CALL Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
The JALT CALL Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching.

About International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching

The 304 papers published in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching usually cover Language and Linguistics (157 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (108 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (109 papers), Computer Science Applications (29 papers) and Health Informatics (7 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (137 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (80 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (50 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (48 papers), Online and Blended Learning (35 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (32 papers), Education and Technology Integration (29 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching are Stephen Bax, Lucas Kohnke, Philip Hubbard, Lina Lee, Paul Sweeney, Jinlan‎ Tang, Qing Ma, Joy Egbert, Mimi Li and Michael W. Marek.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact