Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews

1.2k papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews usually cover Education (368 papers), Sociology and Political Science (252 papers) and Information Systems (207 papers) specifically the topics of Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (105 papers), Educational Methods and Teacher Development (88 papers) and Emergency Medicine Education and Research (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews are Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, Firdouse Rahman Khan, Maria Gayatri, Bahiyah Omar, Oberiri Destiny Apuke, Dwi Agus Kurniawan, Zainudin Awang, Bambang Widi Pratolo, Astalini Astalini and Abd Rahman Ahmad.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025