Archivos Españoles de Urología

1.1k papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Archivos Españoles de Urología in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Archivos Españoles de Urología usually cover Surgery (444 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (368 papers) and Urology (296 papers) specifically the topics of Urological Disorders and Treatments (191 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (129 papers) and Urologic and reproductive health conditions (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archivos Españoles de Urología are Carsten A. Wagner, Juan Ignacio Martínez‐Salamanca, Walter D. Cardona Maya, David Castro‐Díaz, Octavio Castillo, Gonzálo Vitagliano, Montserrat Espuña, Xavier Badía, Wolfgang H. Cerwinka and Andrew J. Kirsch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archivos Españoles de Urología

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archivos Españoles de Urología. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archivos Españoles de Urología.

Countries where authors publish in Archivos Españoles de Urología

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archivos Españoles de Urología. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archivos Españoles de Urología with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archivos Españoles de Urología more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025