Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions

6.5k citations
806 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
    • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Health top 10%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Papers in

    • Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 224
    • Media, Religion, Digital Communication 54
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 39

Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions

555 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Philosophy 1.4k
  • Health 825
  • Geography, Planning and Development 554
  • Religious studies 496
  • Sociology and Political Science 3.8k
Replace Journal of Contemporary Religion with:
Journal of Contemporary Religion United Kingdom
Common Knowledge France
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion United States
History of Religions United States
Postcolonial Studies Australia
Anthropologica Canada
Contemporary Political Theory United Kingdom
European Journal of Sociology United States
Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses Canada
Anthropological Theory United States
Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions relative to Journal of Contemporary Religion United Kingdom Journal of Contemporary Religion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Contemporary Religion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions.

About Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions

The 806 papers published in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions usually cover Philosophy (279 papers), Religious studies (103 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (90 papers), Sociology and Political Science (386 papers) and History (87 papers) specifically the topics of Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (224 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (178 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (85 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (83 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (69 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (67 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (54 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions are Ken Wilber, Danièle Hervieu‐Léger, Robert S. Ellwood, Christian S. Smith, Christopher H. Partridge, Thomas Robbins, Steven J. Sutcliffe, Ann Pellegrini, Paul Gifford and Janet R. Jakobsen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact