Mark Neocleous

2.6k citations
49 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Neocleous

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark Neocleous
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Sociology and Political Science 891
  • Political Science and International Relations 471
  • Geography, Planning and Development 73
  • Gender Studies 94
  • Philosophy 86
Replace Philip S. Gorski with:
Philip S. Gorski United States
Barbara A. Misztal United Kingdom
Nicholas Gane United Kingdom
Johan Heilbron France
Merje Kuus Canada
Roxanne Lynn Doty United States
Maurizio Lazzarato France
William G. Staples United States
Nicholas Rengger United Kingdom
John Paul Lederach United States
Mark Neocleous relative to Philip S. Gorski United States Philip S. Gorski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Philip S. Gorski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Neocleous

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Neocleous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Neocleous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Neocleous more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Neocleous

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Neocleous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Neocleous. The network helps show where Mark Neocleous may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mark Neocleous, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Neocleous Line = papers co-authored together Mark Neocleous links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000270
2 2008118
3 2014116
4 200678
5 200767
6 201162
7 200359
8 201350
9 200645
10 201244
11
The Political Economy of the Dead: Marx's Vampires
200333
12 199629
13 201328
14
Imagining the state
200327
15 201126
16 200019
17 201617
18 199816
19 200716
20 201215

About Mark Neocleous

Mark Neocleous is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Security and Public Health (9 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (8 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (5 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (3 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers) and Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (891 citations), Political Science and International Relations (471 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (73 citations), Gender Studies (94 citations) and Philosophy (86 citations). Mark Neocleous has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Pierson, Anthony Giddens, Tyler Wall, George S. Rigakos, Laura Gutiérrez and Claude Serfati. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Political Theory, Radical philosophy, Alternatives Global Local Political, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Security Dialogue.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact