Fetal and Pediatric Pathology

1.3k papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology usually cover Surgery (403 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (274 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (264 papers) specifically the topics of Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (110 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (103 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology are Enid Gilbert‐Barness, Maria M. Rodríguez, J. Thomas Stocker, Neil J. Sebire, Bahig M. Shehata, Debra S. Heller, Hossein Neámatzadeh, Seyed Alireza Dastgheib, Hart Isaacs and Seyed Reza Mirjalili.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fetal and Pediatric Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025