Health Marketing Quarterly

839 papers and 6.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 839 papers published in Health Marketing Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Marketing Quarterly usually cover General Health Professions (261 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (176 papers) and Marketing (132 papers) specifically the topics of Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (150 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (123 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Marketing Quarterly are Mohan J. Dutta, Graham D. Bodie, Sameer Deshpande, Michael D. Basil, Debra Z. Basil, Alison Dean, Angela Hausman, Richard K. Caputo, Alan D. Smith and William E. Snell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Marketing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Marketing Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Marketing Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Health Marketing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Marketing Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Marketing Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Marketing Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025