Groups Geometry and Dynamics

671 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 671 papers published in Groups Geometry and Dynamics in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Groups Geometry and Dynamics usually cover Geometry and Topology (528 papers), Mathematical Physics (447 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (172 papers) specifically the topics of Geometric and Algebraic Topology (428 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (156 papers) and Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Groups Geometry and Dynamics are Lewis Bowen, Daan Krammer, Mark Feighn, Ashot Minasyan, Emmanuel Breuillard, Mladen Bestvina, David Kerr, Andreas Thom, Narutaka Ozawa and Vincent Guirardel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Groups Geometry and Dynamics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Groups Geometry and Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Groups Geometry and Dynamics.

Countries where authors publish in Groups Geometry and Dynamics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Groups Geometry and Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Groups Geometry and Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Groups Geometry and Dynamics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025