Forum of Mathematics Sigma

615 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 615 papers published in Forum of Mathematics Sigma in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Forum of Mathematics Sigma usually cover Geometry and Topology (418 papers), Mathematical Physics (361 papers) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (163 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (213 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (181 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forum of Mathematics Sigma are Francis Brown, Burt Totaro, Andrew Snowden, Steven V Sam, Ben Adcock, Andrew V. Sutherland, Clarice Poon, Anders C. Hansen, Bogdan Roman and Terence Tao.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forum of Mathematics Sigma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forum of Mathematics Sigma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forum of Mathematics Sigma.

Countries where authors publish in Forum of Mathematics Sigma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forum of Mathematics Sigma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forum of Mathematics Sigma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forum of Mathematics Sigma more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025