Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies

657 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 657 papers published in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies usually cover Anthropology (385 papers), Archeology (290 papers) and Classics (112 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (368 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (175 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies are Mogens Herman Hansen, David Jordan, George Huxley, Wendell Clausen, Norman Austin, Robert Renehan, Géza Alföldy, William Μ. Calder, Lowell Edmunds and Everett L. Wheeler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies.

Countries where authors publish in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025