Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik

3.6k citations
927 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 230
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 194
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 162
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 87
    • Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 69
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 362

Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik

486 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Anthropology 2.3k
  • Classics 762
  • Archeology 1.9k
  • History 462
  • Religious studies 212
Replace L antiquité classique with:
L antiquité classique France
Revue des Études Anciennes France
Revue des Études Grecques France
Artibus Asiae United States
Klio Germany
Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies United States
Iran United Kingdom
Mélanges de l École française de Rome Antiquité France
Philologus Germany
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies United Kingdom
Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik relative to L antiquité classique France L antiquité classique's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
L antiquité classique · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik.

About Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik

The 927 papers published in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik usually cover Archeology (530 papers), Anthropology (382 papers), Classics (96 papers), Religious studies (53 papers) and History (105 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (362 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (230 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (194 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (162 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (87 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (70 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (69 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik are K.A. Worp, James G Keenan, Jan Ν. Bremmer, R. S. O. Tomlin, Christopher P. Jones, Sebastiana Nervegna, Gustaaf G. de Ridder, Salvatore V. Pizzo, Christian Laes and Giuseppe Zecchini.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact