Studia Islamica

879 papers and 3.9k indexed citations

About

The 879 papers published in Studia Islamica in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Islamica usually cover Political Science and International Relations (604 papers), Archeology (370 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (284 papers) specifically the topics of Islamic Studies and History (493 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (298 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (166 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Islamica are Claude Gilliot, Ann K. S. Lambton, Michel Chodkiewicz, Ronald C. Jennings, Halil İnalcık, George Makdisi, Olivier Carré, Bernard Lewıs, Richard W. Bulliet and Norman Itzkowitz.

In The Last Decade

Studia Islamica

602 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Studia Islamica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Islamica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Islamica.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Islamica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Islamica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Islamica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Islamica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026