Classical Antiquity

459 papers and 2.7k indexed citations

About

The 459 papers published in Classical Antiquity in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Classical Antiquity usually cover Anthropology (392 papers), Archeology (176 papers) and Organic Chemistry (77 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (388 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (131 papers) and Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Classical Antiquity are Ian Morris, Mark Griffith, Christopher A. Faraone, Leslie Kurke, Erik Gunderson, Andrew Feldherr, David M. Halperin, André Laks, Deborah Steiner and Elizabeth Asmis.

In The Last Decade

Classical Antiquity

362 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Classical Antiquity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Classical Antiquity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Classical Antiquity.

Countries where authors publish in Classical Antiquity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Classical Antiquity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Classical Antiquity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Classical Antiquity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026