Food Reviews International

1.4k papers and 47.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Food Reviews International in the last decades have received a total of 47.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Food Reviews International usually cover Food Science (591 papers), Plant Science (346 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (331 papers) specifically the topics of Meat and Animal Product Quality (157 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (153 papers) and Food composition and properties (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food Reviews International are Sven‐Erik Jacobsen, Joseph A. Maga, Artemis P. Simopoulos, Krishnapura Srinivasan, E. Guichard, Takashi Mizuno, George P. Rizzi, Ricardo Bressani, R. Hoover and Danji Fukushima.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food Reviews International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food Reviews International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food Reviews International.

Countries where authors publish in Food Reviews International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food Reviews International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food Reviews International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Reviews International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025