Food Engineering Reviews

398 papers and 17.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 398 papers published in Food Engineering Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 17.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Food Engineering Reviews usually cover Food Science (197 papers), Biotechnology (115 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (75 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Inactivation Methods (102 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (72 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food Engineering Reviews are Eugène Vorobiev, Marco Campus, Brijesh K. Tiwari, Gintautas Saulis, Micha Peleg, Shyam S. Sablani, S. Mangaraj, Patrick J. Cullen, Gustavo V. Barbosa‐Cánovas and Da‐Wen Sun.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food Engineering Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food Engineering Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food Engineering Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Food Engineering Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food Engineering Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food Engineering Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Engineering Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025