Countries where authors publish in Personal Relationships
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Personal Relationships. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Personal Relationships with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Personal Relationships more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Personal Relationships
This network shows the impact of papers published in Personal Relationships. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Personal Relationships.
About Personal Relationships
The 1.2k papers published in Personal Relationships in the last decades have received a total of 48.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Personal Relationships usually cover Social Psychology (975 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (395 papers), Demography (303 papers), Clinical Psychology (401 papers) and Health (141 papers) specifically the topics of Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (867 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (344 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (298 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (191 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (147 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (93 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (83 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Personal Relationships are Judith A. Feeney, Christopher R. Agnew, Frank D. Fincham, David A. Kenny, Caryl E. Rusbult, Phillip R. Shaver, John M. Martz, Lorne Campbell, Benjamin Le and Brant R. Burleson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.