This map shows the geographic impact of research published in First Break. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in First Break with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites First Break more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in First Break. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in First Break.
About First Break
The 2.0k papers published in First Break in the last decades have received a total of 20.8k indexed citations . Papers published in First Break usually cover Geophysics (1.3k papers), Ocean Engineering (1.0k papers), Geology (222 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (185 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (85 papers) specifically the topics of Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (975 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (573 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (464 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (376 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (280 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (264 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (234 papers) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in First Break are Torleif Dahlin, S. M. DEREGOWSKI, Stuart Crampin, I.F. Jones, D. H. Griffiths, John Turnbull, Olivier Dubrule, A. Haas, Michael H. Worthington and Tom R. Parker.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.