This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interpretation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interpretation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interpretation more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Interpretation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interpretation.
About Interpretation
The 1.5k papers published in Interpretation in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Interpretation usually cover Geophysics (1.1k papers), Ocean Engineering (599 papers), Geology (218 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (217 papers) and Mechanics of Materials (604 papers) specifically the topics of Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (882 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (579 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (479 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (292 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (251 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (212 papers), Geological formations and processes (209 papers) and Geological and Geophysical Studies (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interpretation are Kurt J. Marfurt, Sergey Fomel, Fangyu Li, Tao Zhao, Hongliu Zeng, Xinming Wu, Ghassan AlRegib, Bruce S. Hart, Atish Roy and Ian Davison.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.