This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geofluids. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geofluids with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geofluids more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Geofluids. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geofluids.
About Geofluids
The 3.4k papers published in Geofluids in the last decades have received a total of 41.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Geofluids usually cover Ocean Engineering (1.2k papers), Mechanics of Materials (1.9k papers), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (431 papers), Geophysics (589 papers) and Geochemistry and Petrology (215 papers) specifically the topics of Rock Mechanics and Modeling (967 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (930 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (800 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (407 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (392 papers), Landslides and related hazards (389 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (289 papers) and Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (287 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geofluids are Paul A. Hsieh, C. E. Manning, Tomochika Tokunaga, S. F. J. Cox, R.M. Bustin, Andrew Putnis, Daniel Broseta, Kurt Bucher, A. M. M. Bustin and Xinrui Cui.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.