Countries where authors publish in Geosciences Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geosciences Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geosciences Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geosciences Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Geosciences Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geosciences Journal.
About Geosciences Journal
The 1.3k papers published in Geosciences Journal in the last decades have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Geosciences Journal usually cover Geophysics (539 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (205 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (172 papers), Geology (133 papers) and Paleontology (144 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (312 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (250 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (203 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (177 papers), Geological formations and processes (146 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (142 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (129 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geosciences Journal are Duck Keun Choi, Sung Kwun Chough, Biswajeet Pradhan, Jin‐Yong Lee, Saro Lee, Yong Il Lee, Kang‐Kun Lee, Hyuck‐Jin Park, Sueng Won Jeong and Ahmed M. Youssef.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.