Exploration Geophysics

2.2k papers and 19.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Exploration Geophysics in the last decades have received a total of 19.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Exploration Geophysics usually cover Geophysics (1.9k papers), Ocean Engineering (959 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (480 papers) specifically the topics of Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (1.1k papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (708 papers) and Geophysical Methods and Applications (702 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Exploration Geophysics are David Clark, M.H. Loke, Esben Auken, R. I. Acworth, Torleif Dahlin, Brian Minty, Kurt Sørensen, Richard R. Hillis, James Macnae and G.R.J. Cooper.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Exploration Geophysics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Exploration Geophysics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Exploration Geophysics.

Countries where authors publish in Exploration Geophysics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Exploration Geophysics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Exploration Geophysics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exploration Geophysics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025