This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fabula. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fabula with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabula more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Fabula. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fabula.
About Fabula
The 541 papers published in Fabula in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Fabula usually cover Classics (80 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (202 papers), Language and Linguistics (85 papers), Anthropology (42 papers) and History (37 papers) specifically the topics of Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (142 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (66 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (32 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (30 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (27 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (26 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (22 papers) and Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fabula are Donald Haase, Wilhelm F. H. Nicolaisen, Heda Jason, Hermann Bausinger, T. Meder, Linda Dégh, Carl Lindahl, Ruth B. Bottigheimer, Ben Edwin Perry and Gillian Bennett.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.