Fabula

466 papers and 720 indexed citations

About

The 466 papers published in Fabula in the last decades have received a total of 720 indexed citations. Papers published in Fabula usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (178 papers), Language and Linguistics (74 papers) and Classics (69 papers) specifically the topics of Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (127 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (55 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fabula are W. F. H. Nicolaisen, Donald Haase, Heda Jason, Linda Dégh, Ben Edwin Perry, Ruth B. Bottigheimer, Carl Lindahl, Gillian Bennett, Véronique Campion‐Vincent and Alex Scobie.

In The Last Decade

Fabula

156 papers receiving 258 citations

Fields of papers published in Fabula

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fabula. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fabula.

Countries where authors publish in Fabula

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fabula. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fabula with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabula more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026