This map shows the geographic impact of research published in logos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in logos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites logos more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in logos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in logos.
About logos
The 510 papers published in logos in the last decades have received a total of 845 indexed citations . Papers published in logos usually cover Philosophy (142 papers), Religious studies (60 papers), History (114 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (85 papers) and Classics (24 papers) specifically the topics of Catholicism and Religious Studies (83 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (55 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (44 papers), Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (29 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (29 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (24 papers), Literacy and Educational Practices (23 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in logos are Prudence Allen, Teresa Iglesias, Linda Zagzebski, George Weigel, Virgil Nemoianu, Paolo G. Carozza, Gregory R. Beabout, James Rachels, Daniel Philpott and G. E. M. Anscombe.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.