Transnational Legal Theory

1.4k citations
296 papers · · active since 2010

Impact in

  • Law top 5%
    • Evolving Legal Systems and Governance
    • Comparative and International Law Studies
    • Environmental law and policy
    • International Law and Human Rights
    • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
    • Political Philosophy and Ethics
    • European and International Law Studies

Papers in

  • Law 147
    • Comparative and International Law Studies 57
    • Evolving Legal Systems and Governance 55
    • Environmental law and policy 22
    • International Law and Human Rights 79
    • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies 45
    • European and International Law Studies 14

Transnational Legal Theory

231 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Transnational Legal Theory
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Law 522
  • Political Science and International Relations 710
  • Strategy and Management 151
  • Industrial relations 8
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 74
Replace Harvard international law journal with:
Harvard international law journal United States
Utrecht Law Review Netherlands
Chicago journal of international law United States
Washington law review United States
International Community Law Review United Kingdom
Studies in American Political Development United States
Columbia journal of transnational law United States
Politics Philosophy & Economics United States
Global Constitutionalism United Kingdom
L Année sociologique France
Transnational Legal Theory relative to Harvard international law journal United States Harvard international law journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Harvard international law journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Transnational Legal Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transnational Legal Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transnational Legal Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transnational Legal Theory more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Transnational Legal Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Transnational Legal Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transnational Legal Theory.

About Transnational Legal Theory

The 296 papers published in Transnational Legal Theory in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Transnational Legal Theory usually cover Law (147 papers), Political Science and International Relations (173 papers), Industrial relations (2 papers), Strategy and Management (29 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (19 papers) specifically the topics of International Law and Human Rights (79 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (57 papers), Evolving Legal Systems and Governance (55 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (45 papers), Environmental law and policy (22 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (19 papers), European and International Law Studies (14 papers) and International Environmental Law and Policies (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transnational Legal Theory are Peer C. Zumbansen, Horatia Muir Watt, Joseph Raz, Karin Buhmann, Louis Jacobus Kotze, Poul F. Kjær, Karl‐Heinz Ladeur, Günther Teubner, Ifesinachi Marybenedette Okafor-Yarwood and Nicolás M. Perrone.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact