Gillian Bennett

660 citations
33 papers · 369 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Gillian Bennett

30 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Gillian Bennett
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Literature and Literary Theory 116
  • Philosophy 75
  • Anthropology 45
  • Clinical Psychology 100
  • Music 12
Replace Anna-Leena Siikala with:
Anna-Leena Siikala
Marta Weigle United States
Peter Hitchcock United States
G. W. Pigman United States
Philip Collins United Kingdom
Ariel Glucklich United States
Erich Neumann United States
Moshé Idel Israel
Jean-Luc Marion France
Jean-Bertrand Pontalis
Gillian Bennett relative to Anna-Leena Siikala Anna-Leena Siikala's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Anna-Leena Siikala · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gillian Bennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gillian Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gillian Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gillian Bennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gillian Bennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gillian Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gillian Bennett. The network helps show where Gillian Bennett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Gillian Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gillian Bennett Line = papers co-authored together Gillian Bennett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200071
2 195751
3 200030
4 199226
5
Traditions of Belief: Women and the Supernatural
198722
6 199921
7 198619
8 199314
9 199411
10 200111
11 198610
12 198910
13 19858
14
Spoken in jest
19916
15 19986
16 19975
17 19975
18
Alas, poor ghost!
19995
19 19855
20 20005

About Gillian Bennett

Gillian Bennett is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Anthropology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (14 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Cultural History and Identity Formation (2 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (116 citations), Philosophy (75 citations), Anthropology (45 citations), Clinical Psychology (100 citations) and Music (12 citations). Gillian Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kate Bennett, Eleanor Zaimis, R. D. Hicks and Paul S. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Folklore, Western Folklore, Journal of American Folklore, Mortality and Rural History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact