Gillian Bennett
Impact in
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Philosophy top 5%
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Papers in
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 14
- Themes in Literature Analysis 2
-
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 6
- Co-authors
- Kate Bennett (2 shared papers)Eleanor Zaimis (1 shared paper)R. D. Hicks (1 shared paper)Paul S. Smith (1 shared paper)Keith Chandler (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Folklore (16 papers)Western Folklore (3 papers)Mortality (2 papers)Journal of American Folklore (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Gillian Bennett
30 papers receiving 253 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Literature and Literary Theory 122
- Philosophy 76
- Clinical Psychology 108
- Anthropology 50
- Music 13
Countries citing papers authored by Gillian Bennett
This map shows the geographic impact of Gillian Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gillian Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gillian Bennett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gillian Bennett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gillian Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gillian Bennett. The network helps show where Gillian Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Gillian Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1957 | 58 | |
| 3 | Traditions of Belief: Women and the Supernatural | 1987 | 33 |
| 4 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 9 | |
| 14 | Spoken in jest | 1991 | 7 |
| 15 | Urban Legends: A Collection of International Tall Tales and Terrors | 2007 | 6 |
| 16 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 17 | Alas, poor ghost! | 1999 | 6 |
| 18 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 5 |
About Gillian Bennett
Gillian Bennett is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Anthropology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (14 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (3 papers), Cultural History and Identity Formation (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (122 citations), Philosophy (76 citations), Clinical Psychology (108 citations), Anthropology (50 citations) and Music (13 citations). Gillian Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kate Bennett, Eleanor Zaimis, R. D. Hicks, Paul S. Smith and Keith Chandler. Their work appears in journals such as Folklore, Western Folklore, Mortality, Journal of American Folklore and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.