Human Dimensions of Wildlife

1.1k papers and 19.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife in the last decades have received a total of 19.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife usually cover Ecology (564 papers), Social Psychology (387 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (278 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (511 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (274 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Dimensions of Wildlife are Michael J. Manfredo, Jerry J. Vaske, Francine Madden, David C. Fulton, Thomas A. Heberlein, Craig A. Miller, Daniel J. Decker, M Jacobs, Stephen G. Sutton and Catherine M. Hill.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife.

Countries where authors publish in Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Dimensions of Wildlife more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025