Environmental Ethics

1.1k papers and 11.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Environmental Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Ethics usually cover Sociology and Political Science (241 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (188 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (112 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (181 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (173 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Ethics are J. Baird Callicott, Karen J. Warren, Bryan G. Norton, Anthony Weston, Ramachandra Guha, Jim Cheney, Paul W. Taylor, Ernest Partridge, Holmes Rolston and Eric Katz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025