Environmental DNA

581 papers and 8.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 581 papers published in Environmental DNA in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental DNA usually cover Ecology (555 papers), Molecular Biology (450 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (83 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (539 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (357 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (300 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental DNA are Hiroki Yamanaka, Louis Bernatchez, Toshifumi Minamoto, Hideyuki Doi, Matthew C. Yates, Satsuki Tsuji, Alison M. Derry, Dylan J. Fraser, Naoki Shibata and Caren S. Goldberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental DNA

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental DNA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental DNA.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental DNA

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental DNA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental DNA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental DNA more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025