URBAN DESIGN International

638 papers and 8.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 638 papers published in URBAN DESIGN International in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations. Papers published in URBAN DESIGN International usually cover Urban Studies (195 papers), Building and Construction (190 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (123 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Design and Spatial Analysis (171 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (98 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in URBAN DESIGN International are Bill Hillier, Ann Forsyth, Matthew Carmona, Kayvan Karimi, Brian Goodey, Karl Kropf, Katie Williams, Besim S. Hakim, Sergio Porta and Ben Hamilton-Baillie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in URBAN DESIGN International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in URBAN DESIGN International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in URBAN DESIGN International.

Countries where authors publish in URBAN DESIGN International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in URBAN DESIGN International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in URBAN DESIGN International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites URBAN DESIGN International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025