Countries where authors publish in Philosophy & Technology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy & Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy & Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy & Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Philosophy & Technology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy & Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy & Technology.
About Philosophy & Technology
The 862 papers published in Philosophy & Technology in the last decades have received a total of 13.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Philosophy & Technology usually cover Safety Research (306 papers), Health Informatics (41 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (329 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (49 papers) and Philosophy (95 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (304 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (209 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (110 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (70 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (49 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (43 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (41 papers) and Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy & Technology are Luciano Floridi, John Danaher, J. Arol Simpson, Tamar Sharon, Shannon Vallor, P.B. de Laat, Mark Coeckelbergh, Pak‐Hang Wong, Reuben Binns and Mariarosaria Taddeo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.