Countries where authors publish in Philosophy & Technology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy & Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy & Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy & Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Philosophy & Technology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy & Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy & Technology.
About Philosophy & Technology
The 952 papers published in Philosophy & Technology in the last decades have received a total of 18.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Philosophy & Technology usually cover Safety Research (417 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (234 papers), Philosophy (201 papers), Computer Science Applications (62 papers) and General Social Sciences (40 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (416 papers), Cybernetics and Technology in Society (195 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (84 papers), Literary and Philosophical Studies (61 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (55 papers), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (47 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (44 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy & Technology are Luciano Floridi, John Danaher, Shannon Vallor, Tamar Sharon, Carlos Zednik, Mark Coeckelbergh, P.B. de Laat, Reuben Binns, Pak‐Hang Wong and Mariarosaria Taddeo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.