Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy

16.2k papers and 423.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.2k papers published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 423.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy usually cover Molecular Biology (7.3k papers), Cancer Research (2.6k papers) and Oncology (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (1.1k papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1.0k papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (736 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy are Ed Harlow, David P. Lane, Artemis P. Simopoulos, Haïm Tapiero, Kenneth D. Tew, Danyelle M. Townsend, Seema Patel, Ralph Snyderman, Ira M. Goldstein and John I. Gallin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025