Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

4.2k papers and 528.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.2k papers published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery in the last decades have received a total of 528.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery usually cover Molecular Biology (1.5k papers), Oncology (509 papers) and Immunology (503 papers) specifically the topics of Computational Drug Discovery Methods (314 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (259 papers) and Biotechnology and Related Fields (208 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery are Asher Mullard, Vladimir P. Torchilin, Róbert Langer, Csaba Szabó, Claudiu T. Supuran, Ricky W. Johnstone, Erik De Clercq, Ruth Duncan, Philip Cohen and Andrew L. Hopkins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Drug Discovery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025