Current Trauma Reports

234 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 234 papers published in Current Trauma Reports in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Trauma Reports usually cover Surgery (106 papers), Emergency Medicine (87 papers) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (42 papers) specifically the topics of Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (63 papers), Management of Spleen Trauma in Polytrauma Patients (37 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Trauma Reports are Ann M. Dellinger, Abe Fingerhut, Selman Uranues, Mark W. Bowyer, Matthew J. Martin, Johan von Schreeb, Melissa A. Hornor, Avery B. Nathens, Christopher Hoeft and Richard Gellman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Trauma Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Trauma Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Trauma Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Trauma Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Trauma Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Trauma Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Trauma Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025