BMC Pulmonary Medicine

3.8k papers and 54.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 54.5k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.8k papers), Physiology (1.0k papers) and Epidemiology (742 papers) specifically the topics of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (951 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (677 papers) and Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (602 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Pulmonary Medicine are Mike Thomas, Thys van der Molen, Kjell Torén, Peter Lee, Martyn R Partridge, David Price, William W. Busse, Paul D. Blanc, David W. Denning and Erkin М Мirrakhimov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Pulmonary Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025