Countries where authors publish in Forensic Sciences Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forensic Sciences Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forensic Sciences Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic Sciences Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Forensic Sciences Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Forensic Sciences Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forensic Sciences Research.
About Forensic Sciences Research
The 358 papers published in Forensic Sciences Research in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Forensic Sciences Research usually cover Archeology (95 papers), Toxicology (27 papers), Genetics (101 papers), Insect Science (37 papers) and Emergency Medicine (25 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (91 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (87 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (52 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (35 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (29 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (27 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (20 papers) and Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forensic Sciences Research are Ricardo Jorge Dinis‐Oliveira, Douglas H. Ubelaker, Alex Forrest, Daniel J. Wescott, Olaf H. Drummer, Jessica J. Miller, Lesley A. Chesson, Eric J. Bartelink, Teresa Magalhães and Shivpoojan Kori.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.